Welcome Guest. ( logon | register )   
FAQ Member List Albums Today's Posts Search

PointedThree :  Vans, Trucks, SUVs and Other Forums : G-Class : Swaping a 617 for a 606

Page 3 of 5 12345
Swaping a 617 for a 606
Topic Tools Message Format
Author
Posted 3/5/2010 9:13 PM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Well today we took our first shot at placing the 606 in it's new home, and found a few problems.

1. The 606 sedan engine supports don't fit. We're going to fabricate some new ones for the original mounts (thanks AlanMcR for advise about the oil filled ones).

2. The AC compressor was removed before hand so it wouldn't snag the steering box (thanks tinker).

3. Then it all came to a stop as expected because the gearbox is sitting to low and touching the top of the tunnel. I will have to lift the truck to increase the height between the chassis and the frame 5cm (2"). The height will be increased using nylon spacers. I'm afraid this solution will create an uncomfortable ride due to the hardness off the spacers. I was thinking of maintaining the rubber supports and placing the nylon either under or on top of the rubber supports but my mechanic doesn't agree. He thinks the swaying of the chassis will tear either end or shear the bolts due to the height of the lift. Does any one have experience they'd like to share or an opinion?

Here are a few pictures of the engine being placed in the engine bay.



(Image0464.jpg)



(Image0465.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Image0464.jpg (135KB - 7 downloads)
Attachments Image0465.jpg (123KB - 5 downloads)
#167685 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/5/2010 9:57 PM
AlanMcR
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: US, CA, Los Altos
Vehicle(s): G300DT E300DT 230SL
Posts: 3500
2000
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Maybe it is a 460 thing, but there seems to be lots of clearance for the transmission on the 463.  Maybe you need to move the engine forward more?  No need for an engine driven fan.  You might want to add a bigger electric fan in front of the radiator though.
#167688 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/6/2010 7:53 AM
Inkblotz
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: Georgia
Vehicle(s): 90 300GD "Thundering Turtle II", w/ 603A turbo
Posts: 3186
2000
Re: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Is this transmission taller/fatter than and largest 460 transmission? If it's not then it should fit. Alan's suggestion of moving it forward may do the trick but you will then need to make adjustments to the length of the drive shaft.

Do you have the transmission support cross member positioned (moved back far enough) to accept the new transmission?

Would it not benefit you to remove the transmission support cross member, lower the Engine/tran in place and see where everything will need to be.

The whole assembly once mounted will drop down a bit down to rest on its full weight.

Just some thoughts.
Mark
#167712 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/6/2010 9:03 AM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606



The problem is that the transmission is taller. The transmission support cross member had been removed. I need to raise the transmission at least 3cm to get the cross member in with the support. I don't see a solution other than raising the chassis. Which is something I'd like to get right, It'll be my daily ride and I'd like to keep it comfy.

Your opinions and thoughts are welcome, great thanks to those who share them.
#167713 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/6/2010 9:20 AM
Inkblotz
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: Georgia
Vehicle(s): 90 300GD "Thundering Turtle II", w/ 603A turbo
Posts: 3186
2000
Re: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Are you sure moving the tranny forward a bit (as Alan suggested) would not get you your 3cms? With the trans being cone shaped as is the tunnel and since you are going to make your own engine mounts it may be a nice/simpler solution.

That is if you are going all electric on your cooling fans.


Mark
#167714 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/6/2010 10:06 AM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

We have tried moving the engine forward but the distance to the driveshaft increased (the sprinter gearbox is about 10cm shorter), I'd have to get a longer driveshaft. About the fans, I haven't decided but would like to keep electrics to a minimum and any free space I get up front would be of great help to get a intercooler in.
#167716 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/6/2010 10:27 AM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Here's a drawing illustrating the setup I thought would give me a more comfortable ride. My mechanic expects some sway that would eventually tear either the chassis or frame and possibly shear the bolt. He suggests removing the rubber all together and simply place the nylon which I expect will make the ride less comfortable.



(Nylon Support.JPG)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Nylon Support.JPG (22KB - 7 downloads)
#167717 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/6/2010 11:25 AM
hipine



Date registered: Jul 2006
Location: US, CO, Bailey
Vehicle(s): 460 1980 280GE w. 617A
5000
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

I second Alan's emotion to check really carefully why the trans seems not to clear. One biggie is to be sure the engine is at the correct angle. Since you don't have front mounts yet, this might be tricky to ascertain. The way I did it was to put an agle finder/level on the top of the cam cover. I wrote about it somewhere here I think. I'm not remembering for certain, but I think the motor should not exceed 5 degrees tip-up at the front. When it's on the hook it can be pretty excessively tipped. Do a lot of homework on this as having it too far tipped up will also cause vibes in the intermediate shaft, or quickly wear a CV shaft if you have that.

If you do want to lift the body though, the way to have your cake and eat it is to buy or make some new cups (where the rubber mounts are captured), cut the old ones off, and weld taller ones in their place. This way you duplicate the factory load transfer scheme, and get your body lift. Body lift is a serious beastie though, causing you to need to asess and re-engineer every single thing that goes from a body element to a chassis one. There are more of them than are at first aparent.

If you want a body lift ofr other reasons, cool, go for it. More room around the trans will only help cool it better. But don't be pushed into a body lift by trans clearance until you're absolutely certain it's required. JMO.

Good luck and nice work!

-Dave G.
#167718 - in reply to #167685
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/6/2010 11:55 AM
syncro
Extreme Veteran




Date registered: May 2007
Location: Orinda, CA
Vehicle(s): '84 280GE LWB > 300GD, '75 240D
Posts: 477
300
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Before I removed my 110 engine, I measured a 12.5 degree difference between cam cover and a fore-aft line along the top of a fender (it was easy to do with a digital level). I marked the line with tape so I could reproduce the angle later.

Stock 617 engine mounts placed the new engine within a tenth of a degree of the original.
I kept that angle when designing my mounts.

The ultimate measure, however, is to be sure the transmission flange and transfer case flange are parallel.


Edited by syncro 3/6/2010 11:57 AM
#167721 - in reply to #167718
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/8/2010 9:11 AM
hus55
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: north cyprus,lapta.
Vehicle(s): 300GDS, G300 LONG,300GDT CLK55 AMG CAB.
Posts: 2230
2000
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

because i am no where near as knowledgable as the guru's here, i would prefer to keep quiet whilst reading this topic. good luck way@out,looking very pro so far.

i would like to comment on the plungers/elements that came out of my 606 pump. they measured 6mm as opposed to the 5.5mm ones that came out of the 603 pump.i will report on the results when i get my cabrio back.
#167804 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/8/2010 3:51 PM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606


Thanks to all for your thoughts and opinions. I'm going to work on the truck towards the weekend, hopefully I'll get an alternative to the body lift with all this help.

#167825 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/9/2010 5:16 AM
gvp
Member




Date registered: Nov 2009
Location: ATHENS-GREECE
Vehicle(s): MERCEDES GD300
Posts: 19

RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Good job,keep posting....
#167862 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/9/2010 9:23 PM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Well I couldn't wait till the weekend... As long as she doesn't know that I pulled an engine that was in perfect working condition and I'm trying to replace it for fun I shouldn't have trouble. She's the "If it's running don't touch it" kind of person.

I remeasured and measured what I didn't measure before the swap. I've got an obese tranny. The last 20cm of the tunnel are level so as I pulled the engine out I didn't get the space I need. This week I should receive a sprinter crossbar and support which I've been told is lower. If it doesn't workout I'll consider selling the tranny and look for a replacement. Here are a few images with measurements.





(3.jpg)



(1.jpg)



(5.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments 3.jpg (157KB - 5 downloads)
Attachments 1.jpg (135KB - 7 downloads)
Attachments 5.jpg (133KB - 8 downloads)
#167902 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/10/2010 11:01 AM
syncro
Extreme Veteran




Date registered: May 2007
Location: Orinda, CA
Vehicle(s): '84 280GE LWB > 300GD, '75 240D
Posts: 477
300
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

that does look tall but the size is all below the shaft center.

Also the mount tab at the rear appears to be farther down from the shaft center than the tab on a G/sedan gearbox.
So you might just need to make a new transmission mount cross member that allows it to sit lower at the rear.

If I recall correctly, there should be plenty of depth between the frame rails to keep the lower sump protected but if it's close, you could always add another cross bar or skid plate to protect it from rocks.

#167916 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/10/2010 12:34 PM
Loki Laufeyjarson



Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: 66°N, 19°W
Vehicle(s):
500
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

syncro - 3/10/2010 3:01 PM

that does look tall but the size is all below the shaft center.

Also the mount tab at the rear appears to be farther down from the shaft center than the tab on a G/sedan gearbox.
So you might just need to make a new transmission mount cross member that allows it to sit lower at the rear.

If I recall correctly, there should be plenty of depth between the frame rails to keep the lower sump protected but if it's close, you could always add another cross bar or skid plate to protect it from rocks.



I think Syncro is spot on.
You have to position the gearbox according to the output flange. A new cross member is all you need......
#167918 - in reply to #167916
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/10/2010 2:15 PM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

syncro - 3/10/2010 4:01 PM

that does look tall but the size is all below the shaft center.

Also the mount tab at the rear appears to be farther down from the shaft center than the tab on a G/sedan gearbox.



In the first picture I have the measurements of the original gearbox (previous) and the measurement of the new gearbox. As you can see the new gearbox is 6cm taller from the shaft center, this is why it won't fit in the tunnel and rest on the original support and cross member. As if that wasn't enough the new gearbox has an extra 1.5cm from the shaft center to the support tab. I agree that my best solution will be either fabricating a new cross member or using the sprinter cross member if it's lower.

#167925 - in reply to #167916
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/10/2010 5:31 PM
hipine



Date registered: Jul 2006
Location: US, CO, Bailey
Vehicle(s): 460 1980 280GE w. 617A
5000
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Way@Out - 3/10/2010 12:15 PM

....I agree that my best solution will be either fabricating a new cross member or using the sprinter cross member if it's lower....


Just keep in mind that lowering the rear changes the angle of the flange in relation to the t-case flange and that greater angle will put greater stress on the shaft, either in the form of vibrations in a U-joint shaft, or in load management/wear in a CV shaft. If you want to try and maintain the prper flange angle, then lowering the trans mount will mean also lowering the motor mounts, which brings the motor closer to the axle. Not saying it can't be done, just saying fore-warned is fore-armed, and the more of this stuff you consider and make an effort to account for, the better your chances of coming out with something that's not a hacked up pile of compromises.

The devil is in the details and you've done a great job figuring things out so far. Looks like you'll come out with a great truck if you can maintain this level of attention to detail through the project. Lots of folks start out with good intentions and throw them out half way through when the going gets tough. I've said it before...perseverence will win the day! And if that means being sure that this isn't the right trans, and going to something else, then so be it. It might not come to that, but the only way you'll know for sure is to walk the path the way you have been.

And thanks for taking the extra time to share what you're learning here. This it the part that I mostly chucked when I did my conversion, rebuild, tranny swap, etc. I had to give up something and in my case staying focused on managing all the issues meant that documentation of what they were for others to follow is what suffered. Now people have to depend on my bad memory and resulting over-simplification in my head when they ask how I did something.

Nice work. Keep it up.

-Dave G.
#167935 - in reply to #167925
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/10/2010 5:57 PM
gvp
Member




Date registered: Nov 2009
Location: ATHENS-GREECE
Vehicle(s): MERCEDES GD300
Posts: 19

RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

I'm thinking if it's better to cut the tunnel and build your own-custom.....

Take a look....

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0703phr_transmission_tunnel_e...
#167936 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/10/2010 7:45 PM
Way@Out
Regular


Date registered: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Vehicle(s): W460 300GD '85
Posts: 69
50
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

Thanks for encouragement Dave, it is a bit frustrating at times.

I have found a solution for the cross member that will get me the space needed. I have cut a piece of steel 52cmX10cmX1cm put it in place with the mount and I get the clearance needed. But as Dave correctly said I'll now have to check the oil pan clearance from the differential. If I do encounter problems here (which I'm sure I will, thanks to Huss55 for the info) I will do a spring lift to clear the oil pan. But before that I will cut the oil pan as Huss55 did. If I'm happy with the swap when completed then I'll buy the proper oil pan and readjust the springs if need be.

GVP, before spending a €uro on this project I made a promise to myself, I won't do anything to the truck that can't be easily undone. In the end if I'm not satisfied I'll put the old 617 back in and learn to be patient. So cutting the tranny tunnel is not an option.

#167938 - in reply to #163276
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 3/13/2010 9:36 PM
v8w460

Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
RE: Swaping a 617 for a 606

The body lift you describe with the standard rubbers and the nylon blocks is similar to the ones on my G and it rides fine, although I've never had it much over 110km/hr but I have also driven over badly washboarded roads. (And no roads). On the down side of a 2" body lift + 2" uprated springs is it can be quite a step into the vehicle and more trees above get in the way. (my lift kit was needed to tuck my RH rocker cover under the brake booster.
Graham
#168010 - in reply to #167938
Top of the page Bottom of the page
« View previous thread :: View next thread »
Page 3 of 5 12345
Forum Jump :
All times are EST.  The time is now 10:27:25 AM.

Execution: 0.410 seconds, 108 cached, 13 executed.